[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCA-Activists] FCC licensing of spectrum (was Re: Weinberger: Why Ope
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
[DMCA-Activists] FCC licensing of spectrum (was Re: Weinberger: Why Open Spectrum Matters) |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 01:20:22 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030101 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Weinberger wrote:
> In the context of these assumptions, it made sense for the Federal
> Communications Commission to begin licensing spectrum as if it were
> a scarce resource under the framework established by the
> Communications Act of 1934.
A similar example [of needless detailed government regulation of
industry], but one which deserves special mention because of its
implicit censorship and violation of free speech, is the control
of radio and television by the Federal Communications Commission.
-- Milton Friedman, `Capitalism and Freedom'
- --
Stephen Compall - Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
Jabber ID: address@hidden
To be a hacker, one had to accept the philosophy that writing a
software program was only the beginning. Improving a program was the
true test of a hacker's skills.
-- Sam Williams, "Free as in Freedom"
According to Stallman, improving software programs was secondary to
building them in the first place.
-- Sam Williams, "Free as in Freedom"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+E+gU2AceYinZ4EgRAmpZAJ4tgZfhGoP4lqtgsHnuHCO1IhZB3QCfSYto
z0cLSWYdSAMaf240uSaJb+s=
=+7in
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [DMCA-Activists] FCC licensing of spectrum (was Re: Weinberger: Why Open Spectrum Matters),
Stephen Compall <=