[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCA-Activists] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] (DC 7/17) NY Arena: Press Outreach R
From: |
Ruben I Safir |
Subject: |
[DMCA-Activists] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] (DC 7/17) NY Arena: Press Outreach Results, 12/3/02 |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:35:00 -0500 |
New York for fair use has been busy working on Peer to Peer
activities
I have no idea what your talking about
On 2002.12.04 07:10 Seth Johnson wrote:
>
> Press Outreach Results:
>
> Tell the FCC to Serve the Public, Not Hollywood!
> Stop the Broadcast Flag Proposal at the FCC!
>
>
> 12/3/02:
>
> 127 Alerts Deployed; 273 Public Comments Posted; 420 Total
>
>
> This past Thursday night, 11/28/02, New Yorkers for Fair Use
> executed a Press Outreach tactic targetting the FCC's
> Broadcast Flag proposal. Over the Thanksgiving weekend, 3
> volunteers devoted 18 hours to deploying the NY Fair Use
> Action Alert (pasted below), calling concerned citizens to
> voice their opposition to this proposal.
>
> >From August 8, the day the Broadcast Flag NPRM was posted,
> to November 26, the FCC had received 147 public comments.
> There were 13 comments in August, 51 comments in September,
> 59 comments in October, and 24 comments through November
> 26. Comments had been coming in at the rate of 5 posted
> throughout the week ending Sunday 11/10, and 6 the week
> ending 11/17.
>
> As of this morning, Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 273
> additional public comments have been posted on the FCC's
> email comments system, for a grand total of 420.
>
> These comments almost exclusively express staunch opposition
> and outrage at the notion of outlawing the public's right to
> own fully-functional digital television technology by means
> of a government mandate for content control. Enter 02-230
> under "Proceeding" at the following link to see the current
> comments: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi
>
>
> This Thursday night, 54 email alerts were sent over the
> course of 6 hours. 44 of these were targeted to one
> recipient or list address, and 10 to sets of related target
> addresses. An undocumented number of online forums received
> postings as well, estimated at 10.
>
> 48 public comments resulted from this outreach, 39 on Friday
> 11/29 and 9 posted over the weekend.
>
> Through the weekend, volunteers dedicated 12 additional
> manhours to posting 53 email alerts, the majority Sunday
> night, 12/1. Of these, 26 were to multiple related
> addresses, and 27 were to individual people or lists.
> Another estimated 10 online forums received postings as
> well.
>
> This produced 119 public comments in opposition to the
> broadcast flag on Monday, 12/2. The total at the end of the
> day was 284 -- nearly double the total of 147 that had been
> posted as of Thursday.
>
> On Tuesday, 12/3, 106 additional comments were posted.
>
> Beginning Tuesday evening, at least two additional
> independent initiatives seem to have sprung up. Joe Kraus
> of Digital Consumer contacted New Yorkers for Fair Use
> expressing his appreciation for our efforts, offering
> support, and asking to emulate our action alert. Since
> then, we have observed numerous comments using a
> standardized text from his organization, and at least one
> other standardized text of unknown origin was observed among
> the comments.
>
> Parity Rates:
>
> One very rough parity rate for this tactic can be described
> in terms of comments produced per emails deployed. We can
> describe an "immediate impact" rate based on total comments
> received by the end of the day Tuesday, compared to the
> total weekend deployment of alerts by 3 volunteers. In this
> way, we can fairly say that 127 emails targetting various
> numbers of addresses apiece, produced an immediate impact of
> 167 comments. We can also fairly say that 48 comments
> resulted from the 64 alerts deployed Thursday night. This
> gives us a very wide rate range, from 75% (48/64) to 131%
> (167/127) -- the main thing is, we have found on this tactic
> that, very roughly speaking, in terms of next day impact, we
> get back roughly the same number of comments as alerts we
> deploy.
>
> The snowball effect is a different matter. Even more
> roughly speaking, as of the end of the day Tuesday, we have
> produced (with the help of other groups that activated after
> Monday) 273 comments out of the same 127 alerts deployed.
> That gives us a return of 331% -- we have gotten 3 times the
> comments back as alerts deployed.
>
> The process of accumulating target addresses is conducted
> separately. On Saturday, 11/23, 2 volunteers conducted an
> online Constituency Target Search for one hour and
> accumulated 23 target news outlets, email lists,
> organizations, individuals, and comprehensive resource
> listing pages representing relevant constituencies. Then
> the Deployment phase targetted these resources.
>
>
> Tabulatingly Yours,
>
> Seth Johnson
>
> :-)
>
> ----
>
> The Alert:
>
>
> New Yorkers for Fair Use Action Alert:
> --------------------------------------
>
> Please send a comment opposing the "Broadcast Flag" Proposal
> to the FCC by this Thursday, December 5, 2002.
>
> Tell the FCC to Serve the Public, Not Hollywood!
>
>
> Okay, you folks understand this issue -- it's very important
> to send word to the FCC by the public comments deadline,
> this Thursday, December 5, that you OPPOSE the Notice of
> Proposed Rulemaking #02-230. This rule would make it
> illegal for ordinary citizens to own fully functional
> digital television devices. We've made it easy; just follow
> the links below.
>
>
> 1) Please send in your comments to the FCC using the form
> provided below. Tell them that the movie industry should
> not have a special privilege to own fully-functional digital
> television devices. Read the alert below for details.
>
> 2) Please forward this alert to any other interested parties
> that you know of, who would understand and see the
> importance of this issue.
>
> 3) Volunteer to help us with this and other alerts related
> to your rights to flexible information technology in the
> future. Two roles you can take up are to become a Press
> Outreach Campaigner or a Commentator. Simply reply to this
> email to show your interest.
>
>
> New Yorkers for Fair Use Action Alert:
> --------------------------------------
>
> Tell the FCC to Serve the Public, Not Hollywood!
>
> Public Comments Needed to Stop the "Broadcast Flag" Proposal
> at the FCC
>
>
> Please follow this link and use the form on the Center for
> Democracy and Technology's site to let the FCC know that the
> public's rights are at stake:
> http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/fcc.flag.xhtml.
>
> What's Going On:
>
> The FCC is considering a proposal that digital televisions
> be required to work only according to the rules set by
> Hollywood, through the use of a "broadcast flag" assigned to
> digital TV broadcasts.
>
> Through the deliberations of a group called the Broadcast
> Protection Discussion Group which assiduously discounted the
> public's rights to use flexible information technology,
> Hollywood and leading technology players have devised a plan
> that would only allow "professionals" to have
> fully-functional devices for processing digital broadcast
> materials.
>
> Hollywood and content producers must not be allowed to
> determine the rights of the public to use flexible
> information technology. The idea of the broadcast flag is to
> implement universal content control and abolish the right of
> free citizens to own effective tools for employing digital
> content in useful ways. The broadcast flag is theft.
>
> In the ongoing fight with old world content industries, the
> most essential rights and interests in a free society are
> those of the public. Free citizens are not mere consumers;
> they are not a separate group from so-called
> "professionals." The stakeholders in a truly just
> information policy in a free society are the public, not
> those who would reserve special rights to control public
> uses of information technology.
>
> Please go to the Center for Democracy and Technology's
> Broadcast Flag Action Page and use their form to let the FCC
> know that the public's rights are at stake:
> http://www.cdt.org/action/copyright/.
>
> ----
>
> Some background links:
>
> http://bpdg.blogs.eff.org/archives/one-page.pdf
> http://www.eff.org/effector/HTML/effect15.22.html#III
> http://www.cdt.org/press/020807press.shtml
> http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/000334.shtml
> http://scriban.com/movabletype_archives/000331.shtml
>
> The following link is the FCC's "Notice of Proposed
> Rulemaking" for the broadcast flag.
>
> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-231A1.pdf
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> ------------------------
> http://www.anti-dmca.org
> ------------------------
>
> DMCA_Discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.microshaft.org/mailman/listinfo/dmca_discuss
>
--
__________________________
Brooklyn Linux Solutions
__________________________
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://fairuse.nylxs.com
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting
http://www.inns.net <-- Happy Clients
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and
articles from around the net
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn....
1-718-382-0585
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] (DC 7/17) NY Arena: Press Outreach Results, 12/3/02,
Ruben I Safir <=