[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plans for ahead
From: |
Michael P. Soulier |
Subject: |
Re: Plans for ahead |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:41:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On 03/12/15 Gregory Casamento said:
> Heh. GNUstep's look is UGLY. The fact that I was a developer on
> NeXT machines 20 years ago and that I am the maintainer should add
> some weight to my opinion. People are turned off by the default look
> of the framework out of the box. Period. As for a desktop
> environment, I answered that above. Apps will come if we make our
> framework attractive and enticing enough for people to actually want
> to use it. Yes, we have to have enough apps to attract users as well,
> so it's a circular relationship, but thus far the ugly out of the box
> look has done nothing but bring us grief.
My main problem with it was that it was pretty much useless to me out of
the box. It required serious manual customization before I could use the
GNUstep environment to do any of my regular work.
Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Plans for ahead, (continued)
- Re: Plans for ahead, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Nicolas Roard, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Riccardo Mottola, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead,
Michael P. Soulier <=
- Re: Plans for ahead, richard, 2015/12/03
- Re: Plans for ahead, Luis Garcia Alanis, 2015/12/03
- Re: Plans for ahead, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/03
- Re: Plans for ahead, James Carthew, 2015/12/03
- Re: Plans for ahead, Luis Garcia Alanis, 2015/12/03
Re: Plans for ahead, Riccardo Mottola, 2015/12/03