[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in L
From: |
Markus Hitter |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard) |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:58:19 +0100 |
Am 27.11.2007 um 18:16 schrieb Dr Tomaž Slivnik:
However, even if some (or a lot of) people are saying that GnuStep
must change its look and "move forward", that does not make it
either the right technical decision or the right business decision.
IMHO, the only technical decision here is wether GNUstep should be
themeable/skinable or not. Which theme/skin to provide by default is
a question for designers.
Furthermore it does not mean that changing the appearance of
GNUstep will result in more people using GNUstep. Where is your
business case for that - what evidence do you have that this will
happen?
To the end user, a good look is more important than anything. Even
professionals aren't immune to fashion. Look at the iPod, look at how
often it was sold as a "backup device".
The reason, in my opinion, that GNUstep is not taking off is
blindingly obvious and much more mundane: the damn thing is
IMPOSSIBLE to install.
First of all, which OS are you talking about? Obviously Mac OS X, but
which of it's flavours?
I'd built up all the prerequisites 5-way fat (ppc/ppc7450/ppc64/
i386/x86_64) only to realize that if I want to build GnuStep itself
5-way fat, I have to build 5 different versions of GCC and build
everything else again with Gnu runtime ... and then rebuild GnuStep
again. It's several more weeks' worth of work!
This is probably the reason why you next to never see 5-way fat
executables. There isn't much point in having so many architectures
as GNUstep isn't meant to do hours of number crunching.
Did you try the apple-apple-apple combo? This should you give you a
GNUstep environment with the minimum effort.
First thing, DarwinPorts failed to install at all because it didn't
like something in my /usr/local.
No doubt, Mac OS X is moving more and more away from being a Unix.
But even with a completely clean machine, DarwinPorts failed, like
this:
Error: The following dependencies failed to build: ArtResources
gnustep-core gnustep-back gnustep-gui gnustep-base gnutls
libgcrypt libgpg-error gettext libtasn1 lzo opencdk readline
ncurses ncursesw libpng libungif tiff jpeg libart_lgpl GMastermind
GMines GNUMail Etoile [...]
Looks like seriously messed up dependencies.
BTW., why are you using Mac OS X instead of a much cheaper Linux-
based PC?
Markus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/12
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Renaud Molla, 2007/11/13
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Dr Tomaž Slivnik, 2007/11/27
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard),
Markus Hitter <=
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Dr Tomaž Slivnik, 2007/11/27
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Markus Hitter, 2007/11/28
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Dr Tomaž Slivnik, 2007/11/28
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Markus Hitter, 2007/11/28
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Dr Tomaž Slivnik, 2007/11/28
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Riccardo, 2007/11/28
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Riccardo, 2007/11/28
- Re: GNUstep theming (was Re: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in Leopard), Riccardo, 2007/11/28