Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Rational Resampler throws double free or corruption error

[Tom Rondeau]

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Frederik Wing <address@hidden> wrote:
> As I said, I cannot design a filter with a sampling frequency below 1e6.
> The Python script I posted (where f_s = 1e3) does NOT work! But if I
> change f_s to 1e6 it works and gives me the gigantic filter.
>
> Frederik

I think I see the problem. Testing now. Not sure why this works on
Intel machines without throwing, actually.

Tom



> Am 18.11.2013 14:35, schrieb Tom Rondeau:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Martin Braun (CEL)
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:19:55PM +0100, Frederik Wing wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> what you are writing is completely right. Simply increasing the sampling
>>>> frequency will result in a more complex filter.
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless the firdes.low_pass function does NOT want to calculate the
>>>> 101-tap-filter. But it DOES calculate the 100001-tap-filter. Really
>>>> strange. So this might not be a memory problem.
>>>>
>>>> The "magic border" I described is at 1MHz. Not at 1GHz as I wrote
>>>> accidentally.
>>> Can you post the exact call too firdes.low_pass(), thanks.
>>>
>>> MB
>>
>> Yes, Frederik, I'm afraid you're not being clear. You say you can't
>> build a 101 tap filter? That's different than what you were saying
>> before. Are you saying that you can't go below 1e6 sps or above it?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio