discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Rational Resampler throws double free or corrupti


From: Frederik Wing
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Rational Resampler throws double free or corruption error
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:46:00 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

Thank you, Tom!
I will try it on my Raspi soon.

Frederik

Am 19.11.2013 04:38, schrieb Tom Rondeau:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Tom Rondeau <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Frederik Wing <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> As I said, I cannot design a filter with a sampling frequency below 1e6.
>>> The Python script I posted (where f_s = 1e3) does NOT work! But if I
>>> change f_s to 1e6 it works and gives me the gigantic filter.
>>>
>>> Frederik
>> I think I see the problem. Testing now. Not sure why this works on
>> Intel machines without throwing, actually.
>>
>> Tom
> This should be fixed now. It works on my Zynq and was failing as you
> described previously.
>
> Tom
>
>
>>> Am 18.11.2013 14:35, schrieb Tom Rondeau:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Martin Braun (CEL)
>>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:19:55PM +0100, Frederik Wing wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what you are writing is completely right. Simply increasing the sampling
>>>>>> frequency will result in a more complex filter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless the firdes.low_pass function does NOT want to calculate the
>>>>>> 101-tap-filter. But it DOES calculate the 100001-tap-filter. Really
>>>>>> strange. So this might not be a memory problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "magic border" I described is at 1MHz. Not at 1GHz as I wrote
>>>>>> accidentally.
>>>>> Can you post the exact call too firdes.low_pass(), thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> MB
>>>> Yes, Frederik, I'm afraid you're not being clear. You say you can't
>>>> build a 101 tap filter? That's different than what you were saying
>>>> before. Are you saying that you can't go below 1e6 sps or above it?
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]