discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] lfrx+loop antenna


From: John Ackermann N8UR
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] lfrx+loop antenna
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:06:17 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

Matt Ettus wrote:
konvak wrote:
hello all, I am thinking about building loop antenna for 3-6 MHz to receive some DRM stations. As I understand it the loop antenna is parallel resonant circuit so without any amplifier the parallel res. circuit should look into big impedance(~1 MOhm) to get high Q. Lfrx has 50 Ohm input due to
the resistor at diff. amplifier. My question is, would it be possible to
remove this resistor and put there 1MOhm and connect it to the loop antenna
with coax. Would it work?


You can remove that resistor, but then the input impedance will be 348 ohms. You can increase that up to maybe 2K by changing out all of the 348 Ohm resistors surrounding the diff amp with 2K ones. However, if you really need a 1 MOhm input resistance you are better off using a buffer amplifier. Usually loop antennas like this for receiving (like you would get at Radio Shack) will have their own buffer for just this reason. Besides, you will want to have some additional gain in front of the LFRX board. I think Chuck Swiger did something with a loop antenna and a USRP a while ago. You might check out his web pages.

Just a thought -- a high-impedance loop can be coupled to a low impedance input by making it into a transformer. For example, a loop I built for WWVB at 60kHz had a 100 foot coil of RG-59 coax as the primary loop, with a capacitor across the ends for tuning. The impedance across the cap was very high. To couple to the receiver, I just threaded one turn of wire into the coil and put my coax connector across its ends; that acted as the secondary of a transformer and brought the impedance down to a useable value (I never did any calculations or measurements on exactly what the input and output impedances were; it just worked).

John




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]