Re: [Denemo-devel] SVN vs CVS (was: templates)

[Jeremiah Benham]

On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 21:34 +0200, N. Gey wrote:
> I absolutly prefer cvs over svn and would be happy.

The website would remain cvs only. SVN is extremely easy to use.  I use
to use it all the time about a year or two ago. Anyway I will send
you/the mailing list documentation for the website and usage.

Jeremiah


> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:48:32 -0500
> > Von: Jeremiah Benham <address@hidden>
> > An: Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > CC: address@hidden
> > Betreff: Re: [Denemo-devel] templates
> 
> > My vote is to switch to SVN. I am willing to do the work and educate
> > myself on this. SVN allows folders to be moved and renamed and things
> > like that. I don't want to have to rely on anyone else to do that
> > because more then likely it is going to happen again in the future. We
> > can keep perhaps keep svn and cvs in sync until we go full svn. I will
> > do the work on this if you want. I spent too much time researching how
> > to do this in cvs and the only ways seemed very evasive and would rely
> > on someone that has shell access to the cvs directory. 
> > 
> > Jeremiah
> > 
> > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 17:30 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > I've lost track of this thread - shall I do this:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Well, I see there is already a directory called examples, containing
> > > > examples of lilypond tweaks. As these can now be put inside Denemo
> > > > files, it would seem to be a good way to go - replacing the .ly files
> > > > with corresponding .denemo files.
> > > > ok?
> > > > Richard
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > or should we take the proper route, which would be to ask the
> > > administrators of the CVS to remove the spurious directory
> > > denemo/templates. (I don't think we can do it ourselves, at any rate I
> > > would not have the confidence to try). The point being that the
> > > denemo/templates directory is not properly registered with CVS - it
> > > doesn't download when no -P (prune) option is given, which it should.
> > > Or, of course, re-build it, or switch to SVN or other more ambitious
> > > things...
> > > Richard
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>