RE: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD

[address@hidden]

Mark D. Baushke writes:
>
> I have addressed more of the Coverity bugs from run 22:

I notice that many of the fixes are testing to be sure pointers
are not null before dereferencing them.  Those pointers should
never be null -- if they are, it indicates something seriously
wrong, either with the code or the RCS file data.  A better fix
might be adding assert()s to make such problems obvious rather
than quietly continuing as if nothing were wrong.

-Larry Jones


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .