Re: [crack-attack-devel] Crack-Attack! 1.1.15 cvs 01 Testing

[Antonio Ospite]

On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:04:58 -0400
Andrew Sayman <address@hidden> wrote:

> > 
> > Anyway, I see that ENet can be very handy for you so maybe the
> > solution is to ask ENet developers to improve their library to
> > achieve Address Family independence [2], albeit the library seems
> > to be untouched by a very long time, and I do not know if there
> > will be further development or support.
> 
> They haven't had a release in a long time, but there is still
> semi-active development. Last time I checked the nightly tarballs
> weren't being updated correctly, but the CVS was. In fact, just this
> month the developer posted a patch to the list. It just hasn't been
> applied.
> 
> I'm going to look over their mailing lists to see if anybody has
> brought up IPv6 before and see about starting a discussion about it.
>

Good to ear :)

> > 
> > Don't take me wrong, I don't want to look too hard, I wanted just to
> > point out the limits of EFnet, if you use it you should know _all_
> > the important implications :)
> 
> Thanks for bringing it up. Does this make crack-attack multi-player
> unusable for you?
>

Not really, for now I use IPv6 as well as IPv4, so I can use
multiplayer on v4, it will be unusable just in IPv4-IPv6 and IPv6-IPv6
scenarios.

> > 
> > BTW, a big thanks for your work on crack-attack, even if i don't
> > play it by a very long time. I have been an addicted in the past
> > and now I try to use it with moderation :)
> 
> The biggest problem with working out a release is that I spend hours
> "testing" the builds.
>

Well, don't you look at this heavy testing as a stessing pleasure? ;)

Regards,
   Antonio.

-- 
  Web site: http://www.studenti.unina.it/~ospite
Public key: http://www.studenti.unina.it/~ospite/aopubkey.asc

pgpZy5lrUGh3W.pgp
Description: PGP signature