Arthur and all,
The screenshots you`ve provided all look well to me. The only thing
I`d like to mention is the width of central part of the page - why
is it so short? For 1920 display resolution it is about 1050 pixels
width (about 55%) of the screen. Why don`t use more space? Let`s
make it occupy, say 75% of screen width to allow more content to fit
there. In the attachent you will find screenshot of Pastiche service
we are using in our company - mostly for pasting logs - and due to
its narrow look there is very huge horizontal scroll on it. In the
attachments you will find original look of pastiche page with a very
long log opened in it (pastiche-1.png) and modified version of the
chicken.css where central part is made 1440px (75% of screen width)
- looks much more attractive (to me, at least :) ).
On 28.08.2014 06:45, Arthur Maciel
wrote:
- readability: larger font-size and line-height and with
more decorated [procedure] tags according to CHICKEN's
logo basic colors. Also note that the monospace font in
the main text is in bold to allow emphasis on keywords.
- shadow-width-size: basically the shadow removal (as many
people on #chicken found it outdated) with natural width
increase, a small increase in font-size + line-height and
the effort to make submit button and input texts of the
search bar the same size (their size was reduced a bit to
keep the focus on the page main content).
What do you think? Any opposition to these changes? All
comments are welcomed.
Thomas is testing this new proposal on many
platforms/browsers as possible and is trying to fix some
other bugs. I really appreciate your work, Thomas!
All the best,
Arthur
--
Thanks,
Yaroslav
|