[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:56:19 -0500 |
Heh. That is pretty amusing, but more a formatting issue on the part of
chicken-status. Or you could chalk it up to the egg's use of a flonum instead
of a string or symbolic version number (0.2.3 is read as a symbol, whereas 0.2
is read as a number). For example, were you to use (version 1.00), it would
read as a flonum and display "1.0" on UNIX, which is just as incorrect as "1."
in my opinion.
One way to quickly fix this for your case is to change (version 1.0) to
(version "1.0") in your .setup file. I try to use string version numbers
exclusively now for consistency's sake.
Jim
On Jul 9, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Michele La Monaca <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> wrote:
>> If you're really concerned about this (which is ultimately aesthetic)
>
> Is this acceptable?
>
> C:\TMP>chicken-status | tail -3
> socket ....................................................... version: 0.2.3
> srfi-37 ...................................................... version: 1.3.1
> win32-msgbox .................................................... version: 1.
>
>> then you should consider setting flonum-print-precision to 17, which will
>> make an actual difference in rare
>> cases. http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library/flonum-print-precision
>
> It doesn't seem to do any difference (in this case at least). Thanks, anyway.
>
> Michele
- [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, John Cowan, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, John Cowan, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Peter Bex, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Jim Ursetto, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw,
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Peter Bex, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Felix, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09