[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:31:43 -0500 |
If you're really concerned about this (which is ultimately aesthetic) then you
should consider setting flonum-print-precision to 17, which will make an actual
difference in rare cases.
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library/flonum-print-precision
On Jul 9, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Michele La Monaca <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Chicken uses the local C's idea of number-to-string conversion.
>
> Not the best approach I think. I would rather prefer a consistent behavior.
>
>> Since "1." is a valid Scheme inexact number, that's perfectly fine.
>
> Being a valid Scheme number it's not a valid reason to dislay it as it is,
> IMHO.
>
> Michele
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
- [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, John Cowan, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, John Cowan, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Peter Bex, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw,
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Jim Ursetto, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Peter Bex, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Felix, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09