[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] c-string return question
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] c-string return question |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:07:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
> So I'll stick with the test case and remove the "static" keyword from
> the buffer definition once I have an updated gcc in my production
> environment.
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to
show their absence!" --Edsger Dijkstra
And this is especially true for Heisenbugs like this. Keep the 'static'
permanently: it's safe and it costs essentially nothing.
--
My confusion is rapidly waxing John Cowan
For XML Schema's too taxing: address@hidden
I'd use DTDs http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
If they had local trees --
I think I best switch to RELAX NG.
Re: [Chicken-users] c-string return question, Jim Ursetto, 2011/10/13
Re: [Chicken-users] c-string return question, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/10/13
Re: [Chicken-users] c-string return question, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/10/13