[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:18:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 05:11:25PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> What would be more appropriate?
>
> "unsafe-io"
> "fast-unsafe-io"
> "unsafe-io-procedures"
> "nonstandard-fst-io"
How about specialized-io or optimized-io? The io routines aren't
general-purpose like the basic Chicken ones, which is one reason why
they can be faster.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
- Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2010/04/06