[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home
From: |
Graham Fawcett |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:28:06 -0500 |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I hereby humbly propose the removal of key-on from the combinators egg
> on the basis that it is entirely redundant with cmp-key in the orders
> egg, except for the fact that the documentation for the orders egg
> needs a bit of love and care.
If redundancy were a reason for deleting egg functionality, we have
about seven object systems to get rid of. ;-)
I don't mind, Alejo. I've started documenting the orders egg as an act
of good faith.
Graham
- [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Kon Lovett, 2008/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Kon Lovett, 2008/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home,
Graham Fawcett <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Graham Fawcett, 2008/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/02/24
Re: [Chicken-users] two procedures looking for a good home, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/02/21