[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite
From: |
Ivan Raikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:03:21 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
That's true, I should have said that the different licenses might
become an issue if you are distributing several eggs together. Though
I am not overly worried about GPL violations in distributions
of machine-generated C code, so that might be a sensible exception
clause to add GPLed eggs.
-Ivan
John Cowan <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Not only that, but if you want to deliver an application in C form,
> you have to license the application as a whole under the GPL iff
> it incorporates any GPLed egg.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Elf, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Elf, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Ivan Raikov, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Elf, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Ivan Raikov, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Elf, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, John Cowan, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite,
Ivan Raikov <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Elf, 2008/02/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, John Cowan, 2008/02/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Ivan Raikov, 2008/02/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, John Cowan, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, Shawn Rutledge, 2008/02/13
Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Ozzi, 2008/02/12