[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Console client, signal handeling patch
From: |
M. Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: Console client, signal handeling patch |
Date: |
Mon, 5 May 2003 21:06:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 |
Quoting Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>:
> Well, when hacking stuff, you onviously know how to deal with that. I am
> using two systems and a serial console, so I never end up with a useless
> system by having the console crash.
I know :)
> However, for a production system, I don't want those unexpected signals to
> happen, so I don't think I want to catch me, too. We don't do in any other
> part
> of the system either.
Should I adept the patch to handle SIGTERM only?
Thanks,
Marco
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/02
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/02
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/04
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Niels Möller, 2003/05/04
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch,
M. Gerards <=
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/05
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Jeff Bailey, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Neal H. Walfield, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Neal H. Walfield, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Jeff Bailey, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/06