[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Console client, signal handeling patch
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Console client, signal handeling patch |
Date: |
Mon, 5 May 2003 21:13:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 09:06:36PM +0200, M. Gerards wrote:
> Should I adept the patch to handle SIGTERM only?
I think so, and Niels made a good point about that as well. As nobody
else has a comment to offer, that makes 2 against 1 and we win :)
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/02
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/02
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/04
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Niels Möller, 2003/05/04
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/05
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Jeff Bailey, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Neal H. Walfield, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Neal H. Walfield, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, Jeff Bailey, 2003/05/06
- Re: Console client, signal handeling patch, M. Gerards, 2003/05/06