[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:20:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tony Abou-Assaleh <address@hidden> writes:
>> + static int matcher_is_set;
>
> Shouldn't we initialize matcher_is_set to 0? Some compilers will do, but I
> think it is not a guaranteed behaviour.
It is. Even K&R did so.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, (continued)
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Bob Proulx, 2005/06/26
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Bob Proulx, 2005/06/26
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/23
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/24