[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:17:50 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Charles Levert <address@hidden> writes:
> How about something like
>
> configure --with-wrapper-scripts
>
> ?
> Is there some precedent for such a configure
> option (and its name) in another GNU software?
Not as far as I know, no.
>> (main): Do not let behavior depend on the name of the program;
>> as required by the GNU coding standards.
>
> Why are you also removing the MS-DOS code to
> strip C: off of program_name?
Because the behavior no longer depends on the program name, so it's OK
to leave the program name as-is. The usual tradition in GNU code
(e.g., coreutils) is a simple "program_name = argv[0];".
- Review Process [was: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem], (continued)
- Review Process [was: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem], Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Bob Proulx, 2005/06/26
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Bob Proulx, 2005/06/26
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Charles Levert, 2005/06/23
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Andreas Schwab, 2005/06/24
- Re: grep-2.5.1a egrep/fgrep PATH problem, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/24