[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it)
From: |
Tim Waugh |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it) |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:07:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:28:54AM +0100, Gordon Lack wrote:
> However, I'm started reporting this as a bug in grep, not in Fedora.
> It isn't of much use for people collecting the grep source from the GNU
> repository if fixes are only in a Fedora distribution as additonal
> patches.
The Fedora CVS is a pristine GNU grep release plus patches. The GNU
CVS is a full tree, tagged at release. GNU grep is the real grep, but
it so happens that I'd made a few patches for it for the Fedora
package.
> I'm now getting a little confused as to whether I'm talking to Fedora
> development or Grep development.
address@hidden is the GNU grep development list. Bugzilla is
Fedora, and I mostly concern myself with Fedora packaging of grep
rather than grep hacking per se, although of course I hope that my
patches (or at least, equivalent patches to fix the original bugs) are
incorporated into GNU grep CVS.
> The Changelog at savannah.gnu.org indicates that my original fix
> (reported as fixed in Fedora) has gone into the GNU code. (However,
> I can't run CVS through my firewall, so I can't download CVS
> code...)
Yes. Upgrading the Fedora package to the next grep release might be a
bit time-consuming due to having different fixes for the same problem,
that's all. My problem, not yours. :-)
Tim.
*/
pgpixgAjc3kSu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Gordon Lack, 2005/04/27
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Tim Waugh, 2005/04/27
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Gordon Lack, 2005/04/27
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Tim Waugh, 2005/04/27
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Gordon Lack, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Julian Foad, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Stepan Kasal, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it),
Tim Waugh <=
- Re: Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it) [bug-grep], Charles Levert, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Julian Foad, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Gordon Lack, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Julian Foad, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Gordon Lack, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Gordon Lack, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Julian Foad, 2005/04/28
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Julian Foad, 2005/04/28
- Re: [bug-grep] Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it), Tony Abou-Assaleh, 2005/04/28
- Message not available
- [bug-grep] New tests failing [was: Bug in grep 2.5.1a (+ patch to fix it)], Julian Foad, 2005/04/28