Re: Applying outstanding patches [bug-grep]

[Julian Foad]

Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:02:55PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Yup, that's what I did, but some of the patches are new since then.
>
> Do you mean the grep-2.5.1-w.patch and grep-2.5.1-tests.patch patches?

Those and several others.  Your email from way back then is quoted below; 
Grep's current patch queue is at <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?group=grep>

> They are both from Jakub Jelinek, and were not logged via Bugzilla.
> The grep-2.5.1-w.patch patch fixes the failures highlighted by the
> grep-2.5.1-tests.patch patch.

Thanks for that info.  I have annotated the grep-2.5.1-w.patch patch issue 
(#3809).

Does Jakub Jelinek have a GNU copyright assignment or disclaimer for Grep?  (If 
he works for Red Hat, I'll assume he's covered.)

- Julian



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Red Hat has a bunch of fixes
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:36:00 +0100
From: Tim Waugh <address@hidden>
To: grep-devel-list <address@hidden>
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden> 
<address@hidden>

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 05:10:44PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:

> grep-2.5-i18n.patch       something to do with wide/multi-byte chars

This originally came from the Mandrake package (2.5-6mdk), so perhaps
one of their number can shed more light on its origins.

> grep-2.5.1-bracket.patch  character class matches '[': RH #108484

I wrote this to fix bug #108484:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108484

> grep-2.5.1-fgrep.patch    ?

I wrote this to fix bug #116909:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116909

> grep-2.5.1-gofast.patch   patch #3478

I wrote this to partially address bug #69900:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69900

> grep-2.5.1-manpage.patch  RH

I wrote this to fix bug #106267:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106267

> grep-2.5.1-oi.patch

I wrote this to fix bug #111489 while avoiding glibc bug #112869:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869

The original bug report was bug #72641:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72641

Tim.
*/