[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: errno --> errno name ?
|
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
|
Subject: |
Re: errno --> errno name ? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:46:39 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Eric Blake <address@hidden>
() Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:00:06 -0600
Not true. Use of : is portable to all shells that support
functions, which is pretty much every shell out there today
(including Solaris /bin/sh). Autoconf has already proved this
point.
OK, i stand corrected. I can let that memory fade now...
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, (continued)
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/08/05
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/08/05
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/08/05
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/08/13
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruno Haible, 2011/08/14
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/08/14
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruno Haible, 2011/08/14
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/08/14
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2011/08/05
- Re: errno --> errno name ?, Eric Blake, 2011/08/05
- Re: errno --> errno name ?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=