[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about critical_factorization() in the Two-Way algorithm
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: Question about critical_factorization() in the Two-Way algorithm |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:26:30 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 12/18/2010 06:58 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hello Pádraig,
>
>> I've rebased the attached memmem reorg patch
>> which splits correctness checks from performance checks.
>
> How about a couple of stylistic changes: use GNU style whitespace placement,
> 'const char *' not 'char *' for string literals, and NULL not 0 for the null
> pointer, preprocessor command indentation, and an improved comment.
> OK to commit?
Yes.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Prev by Date:
Re: floor, ceil, trunc, round, minus zero, and alpha
- Next by Date:
Re: floor, ceil, trunc, round, minus zero, and alpha
- Previous by thread:
Re: Question about critical_factorization() in the Two-Way algorithm
- Next by thread:
Possible Bug in Gnulib
- Index(es):