[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:41:38 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:34:29PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Two copies of the same file in the same repository would be a
> maintenance hassle. I'm for the sed-based solution; a --lgpl option
> to gnulib-tool would be a fine way to implement it. But we should
> clarify in a top-level README that "although this code is marked as
> being under the GPL, it may all be redistributed under the LGPL". So
> that every contributor knows about it.
If we store it all as LGPL code, then no such notice is necessary.
Section 3 of the LGPL states it clearly.
I'm not hung up on it, though. =) I just want to minimise the admin
hassle with the FSF.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, Karl Berry, 2003/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, Karl Berry, 2003/01/24
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, Karl Berry, 2003/01/24