[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame |
Date: |
Mon, 07 May 2018 21:40:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
tags 31373 fixed
close 31373 26.1
quit
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> OK, let's push it to emacs-26, and thanks...
Done [1: 1d9e66aea1].
> Btw, is it reasonable for this function to return nil on TTY frames?
> One frame is definitely displayed "on top".
I think it's not completely unreasonable to return nil, but it would
probably make more sense to return a list of frames starting with the
"on top" (displayed) frame.
[1: 1d9e66aea1]: 2018-05-07 21:35:25 -0400
Don't check non-X frames for z order (Bug#31373)
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=1d9e66aea17787e03954f32c6cd7561c881bb444
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, (continued)
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2018/05/06
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/10
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2018/05/11
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, martin rudalics, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame,
Noam Postavsky <=