[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame |
Date: |
Mon, 07 May 2018 20:59:10 +0300 |
> Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 08:26:01 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
>
> - if (XFRAME (frame)->output_data.x->parent_desc == children[i]
> - || FRAME_OUTER_WINDOW (XFRAME (frame)) == children[i])
> + if (FRAME_X_P (frame)
> + && (XFRAME (frame)->output_data.x->parent_desc == children[i]
> + || FRAME_OUTER_WINDOW (XFRAME (frame)) == children[i]))
>
> Thank you. Eli, I think Noam should push this to 26.1, if still
> possible.
Why? The workaround is very simple: don't call that function in a
daemon session that has no GUI frames.
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2018/05/06
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, martin rudalics, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/07