bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014).

[Clément Pit--Claudel]

On 2016-12-18 12:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:33:10 -0500
>>
>>> Thanks.  So, like I said: let's revisit this in a month or two,
>>> assuming no other problems surface.
>>
>> I've been using your patch since then, and everything works fine for me.  Is 
>> it a good time to revisit this?
> 
> What about my question here:
> 
>   https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21028#98
> 
> Did you try that?  What were the results?

Sorry, I missed that message.

It works!  But only for the original example (with Arial), AFAICT.  Do you know 
what the equivalent fix would be for the recipe given in 
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21028#62 ?

Thanks!
Clément.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature