bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014).

[Clément Pit--Claudel]

On 2016-10-28 10:33, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:23:36 -0400
>>
>>> Did you try the recipe described in
>>>
>>>   https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17125#26
>>>
>>> ?  I tried, but couldn't see any errors, but I don't have a 7x13 font
>>> on my system, so maybe the problem doesn't get trigger.
>>>
>>> That's the only reason the other part of the patch was introduced, and
>>> if it's no longer pertinent, we could go back.
>>
>> I tried it, and I can't reproduce the error either.
> 
> Thanks.  So, like I said: let's revisit this in a month or two,
> assuming no other problems surface.

I've been using your patch since then, and everything works fine for me.  Is it 
a good time to revisit this?

Thanks!
Clément.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature