[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:46:02 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:17:14 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> CC: 12881-done@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> I moved the replacement definitions of O_RDWR and
> O_NOCTTY into nt/inc/unistd.h rather than to some other
> spot in term.c.
I wish you'd discuss this first. O_RDWR doesn't need to be defined
(it is already defined by a Windows system header), and defining
O_NOCTTY in a header included by many sources is wrong, because it
triggers compilation of other non-Windows friendly code elsewhere.
Looks like I invested all that effort in vain, and the Windows build
will be broken anyway. Sigh.
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, (continued)
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Stefan Monnier, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Drew Adams, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/17
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/17
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/15