[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH] |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:26:16 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:29:43 +0200
> From: FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN <address@hidden>
> CC: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
>
> On 26/03/2017 17:21, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:39:52 +0200
> >> From: FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN<address@hidden>
> >> CC:<address@hidden>,<address@hidden>
> >>
> >> >> Is that against portability ?
> >> >
> >> > The way you want it? yes, because I cannot write a portable Awk script
> >> > without system dependencies.
> >>
> >> No, not the Awk script but its caller.
> >
> > An Awk script can invoke another instance of Awk, right?
>
> Regardless, *any* language is able to use "!=0" as a criterion instead of
> "==1"
That's not portability in my book, because I have no way of testing
for specific kinds of errors in platform-independent way.
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], (continued)
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/26
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], FERRIEUX Alexandre - IMT/OLN, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/28
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/28