[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMX on DOS
Re: EMX on DOS
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:50:47 GMT
"Paul Edwards" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
> I did a general Posix one for any unspecified Posix system,
> which doesn't necessarily have a shell.
Incidentally, there are other reasons why someone
might be unable to run configure.
I spent HOURS trying to figure out why it wasn't
working on the Sun Solaris system. Turned out that
the default .profile I was provided with had CC set
to CC, and this was overriding the "cc" program
which I expected it to use. I think I was seeing the
CC and believing that that was config somehow
telling me that it was using an INTERNAL variable
to run the compiler, and I thought nothing of it. I didn't
know we had a CC compiler install.
What I DID know was that we had a posix compliant
compiler in cc, and all I needed was posix source code
and a list of files to compile and I would be in business.
That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.
Incidentally, I still haven't found out why when going
from cvs 1.11.<m> to cvs 1.11.<n> the executable jumped
in size enormously.
Small code changes don't do things like that. A small
change to Posix compliant source code would not have
caused a change like that. I was only expecting small
code changes, not mammoth increases in executable size.
These things are all eliminated if you just provide
Posix source code. Very simple, very portable. Compliant
C code is portable. C code that depends on other software
to be installed is not. Portable C code will compile on
EMX 0.9d. I would never be in the position of having to
install a different C compiler, just to get the source code to
compiler. Or a different version of bash. Or a different
operating system. Or a different installation of a particular
operating system. That ain't portable!
Re: EMX on DOS, Larry Jones, 2003/11/01
Re: EMX on DOS, Paul Edwards, 2003/11/02
RE: EMX on DOS, Rick Genter, 2003/11/03
Re: EMX on DOS, Paul Edwards, 2003/11/04
- Re: EMX on DOS, (continued)