bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1.12 dev version number


From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: Re: 1.12 dev version number
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 10:58:03 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

Tobias Weingartner wrote:

On Wednesday, February 5, Derek Robert Price wrote:
I currently have the trunk marked as 1.12.0.1, which is potentially confusing since previously thius would have meant the dev version _after_ a 1.12 release.

After a 1.12 release, comes a 2.0, or a 1.13 release.  Why bother with
one dot blargh dot woof dot foo dot meta dot whatever?  It just makes it
confusing.

CVS ain't that big.  If they are using the CVS version (head), then they
report bugs agains -current (or -cvs).  If not, they report bugs against
a simple version number.

--Toby.

Because some people might get a development version and not know. When they report the version number to us, we _do_ know.

Derek

--
               *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
--
This is the fourth?
                        - Thomas Jefferson's last words
                            (he died on the 4th of July)







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]