bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

1.12 dev version number


From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: 1.12 dev version number
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:44:30 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

I currently have the trunk marked as 1.12.0.1, which is potentially confusing since previously thius would have meant the dev version _after_ a 1.12 release.

Any opinions on whether I should:

  1. Call it 1.11.99.1 on the premise that we will never reach a stable
     1.11.99 release anyhow.
  2. Call it 1.12.0.0 and temporarily defy our previous standard,
     possibly resulting in some error reporters thinking it okay to
     truncate version numbers and report errors in 1.12.
  3. Change the standard and call the post 1.12 version 1.12.1.1 on the
     premise that it is leading up to 1.12.1.
  4. Do something else entirely.


I prefer #3 at the moment but I am still interested in hearing arguments for alternatives.

Derek

--
               *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
--
For sale:  One parachute.  Never opened.  Small stain.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]