[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dubious features
|
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
|
Subject: |
Re: Dubious features |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:27:52 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> That reminds me of another Posix incompatibility that I'd like to fix.
> Posix says that a grammar can use <tag> without %union, and then it's
> the user's responsibility to define the type YYSTYPE.
That'll be nice. I sometimes put my YYSTYPE in a "YYSTYPE.h". It has
seemed strange that I have to #define YYSTYPE YYSTYPE to make it work.
Joel
Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dubious features, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/10
- Re: Dubious features, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/11