Re: Dubious features

[Joel E. Denny]

On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:

> In the course of splitting the scanner, so that we have a more
> state-less scanner and therefore more freedom in the parser, there are
> two "features" that I would like to discuss, because I don't think we
> should keep them (as are).
> 
> - Adding a trailing semi-colon

[snip]

> - The "arbitrary C-code after %union".

I don't understand the need for either feature in any form.  I don't use 
them, but I have no feel for what others do.

Joel