axiom-developer
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Axiom-developer] Test of a WEB style


From: Bill Page
Subject: RE: [Axiom-developer] Test of a WEB style
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 01:28:27 -0400

On May 4, 2007 12:52 AM C Y wrote:
> 
> I have created a sample file of a format for pamphlets that can
> be generated without needing the noweb style file (obviously
> without many of the major features.)  
> 
http://portal.axiom-developer.org/Members/starseeker/cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftes
t.pdf/download

Cliff, I do really like the "look and feel" of this example!
It looks pretty and it seems to work.

> 
> This file makes use of the hyperref and listings packages in
> LaTeX (I believe both are included standard with teTeX).  It
> has hyperlinks from chunk references to chunks.  To generate
> it, the commands were:
> 
> latex cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.tex
> bibtex cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest
> latex cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.tex
> latex cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.tex
> latex cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.tex
> dvips cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.dvi -o cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.ps
> ps2pdf cl-web-v0.5-hyperreftest.ps
> 
> (thanks again to Bill for figuring out these steps and the
> hyperref options for endpamphlet).

I presume the above steps (because there are so many) include
the processing for the embedded graphviz commands used to
generate the finite-state diagram? If so, very nice.

What does the actual pamphlet source file look like? Specifically,
how are chunks delimited? Can you give us a link to the source
.pamphlet file?

> 
> If it is of interest the "Included in ..." tail can be added
> to identify chunks containing the current chunk, although I 
> didn't do that here because I'm generating this one by hand
> as a test case.

Ah. By "generating this one by hand" do you mean that this is
not (yet) generated by some operation equivalent to 'noweave'?
So you do not (yet) have the source that would produce the above
result? Or are you just talking about the "Included in ..."?

> Feedback appreciated - is this something people think would
> be good to have?  If so, I believe it can be autogenerated
> from cl-web requiring only packages already present in teTeX.
> 

How much work remains to be done to do this autogeneration?
(autogeneration == noweave?)

Regards,
Bill Page.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]