|
From: | Christian Aistleitner |
Subject: | Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Re: exports and constants |
Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:14:05 +0200 |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/9.00 (Linux) |
Hello, On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:21:03 +0200, root <address@hidden> wrote:
I agree, .asy or Foam is better than C or LISP, for what you are considering. But Ralf considered looking into the compiler sources. The discussion has now drifted towards "I do not need the sources; I simply compile to <some Language> and get the required information by mysolf". Thereby, I guess you are barking up the wrong tree.I might mention that the lisp output would be significantly easier to parse and maintain.
If you pursue the "I do not need the sources; I simply compile to <some Language> and get the required information by myself" idea, I'd still think asy or Foam are better than LISP or C.
Obviously, C is worst solution, as it is hard to parse.But asy, foam, asd LISP files are all more or less in LISP syntax. And asy and foam even use only a proper subset of the langauge. And the needed inforamiotn is presented more adequately IMHO.
You want a simple parser. I fully agree. But parsing asy or foam is probably even easier than parsing LISP.
-- Kind regards, Christian
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |