[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] B#
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] B# |
Date: |
24 Mar 2006 10:23:56 +0100 |
root <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
| we would probably get further faster by working out the exact
| coercion/conversion graph and formalizing the mechanism. then we could
| make the interpreter smarter as well as extend it to special domains
| (e.g. to interval arithmetic which does not preserve the distributive
| property).
Thanks you pointed out this. It is a very fundamental issue. I have
been asking myself: "But this B# thingy smells much like ML/Haskell
and its descendent, but where are the type conversions formally
defined?" I've read Weber's and Doye's contributions; I have the
distinct feeling I'm still missing the "big picture", i.e. the picture
is still incomplete.
-- Gaby
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, C Y, 2006/03/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/27
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/23
RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/23
RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/23
RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/24
RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/24