[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] B#
From: |
root |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] B# |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:11:59 -0500 |
ok, lets get the confusion out of the way before this gets too far along...
The "stack" of languages looks like:
spad -- an algebra language using types
spad compiler -- defines the algebra language and types
boot -- a non-parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
in the interpreter
interpreter language -- spad-like, uses types
boot -- a non-parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
the B-natural language sits here:
b-natural -- single-type langauge
interpreter language -- spad-like, uses types
boot -- a non-parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
since boot is syntactic sugar for common lisp and quite unnecessary
for anything the future stacks look like:
spad -- an algebra language using types
spad compiler -- defines the algebra language and types
common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
interpreter language -- spad-like, uses types
common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
and maybe
b-natural -- single-type langauge
interpreter language -- spad-like, uses types
common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
Note that Bill and I disagree about boot's future.
Note that B-natural and Boot are COMPLETELY unrelated.
t
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#,
root <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, C Y, 2006/03/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/27
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/23