[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] B#
From: |
root |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] B# |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:31:19 -0500 |
The single hardest part of the Bnatural interpreter would be writing
the semantics of the evaluator. Because it mixes every possible type
of syntax-to-semantics mapping it is important that the syntax is
not ambiguous.
We'd have to develop the grammer and semantics very, very carefully.
t
- [Axiom-developer] B#, Hans Peter Würmli, 2005/11/19
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2005/11/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Hans Peter Würmli, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#,
root <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2005/11/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Doug Stewart, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2005/11/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2005/11/20