[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:28:11 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:25 AM
> To: Georg Lay
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile
>
> As Georg Lay wrote:
>
> > Thanks, that works. Now using 3.81 instead of 3.80.
>
> Yes, Dmitry introduced some pattern derivations that require 3.81.
>
> > One more question: How does avr-libs determine if a
> specific target is
> > supported or not?
>
> See configure.ac: it tries to test-compile a minimal piece of code,
> and relies on GCC's exit code to see whether the respective -mmcu
> option value is acceptable or not. GCC currently has a bug in that it
> doesn't correctly report an error status if the -mmcu option value is
> not actually supported (GCC bug #45261); instead, it relies on the
> assembler to fail. So if your binutils support a device the compiler
> doesn't support, the decision will be wrong.
>
And just to be clear, we will fix that bug so that GCC will properly error out.
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, (continued)
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/11/02
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, Weddington, Eric, 2010/11/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, Georg Lay, 2010/11/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/11/03
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, Georg Lay, 2010/11/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-libc-1.7.0 fails to compile, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/11/03