[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument
|
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
|
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument |
|
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:10:41 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Andy H
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:26 PM
> To: Ron Kreymborg; AVR-GCC
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument
>
> It's possible to have a target specific compilation flag that turns
> error into warning. Perhaps
>
> -no-error-but-warn-me-until-i-figure-it-out.
>
> ..or similar.
>
That seems rather silly. Make it a warning, and then if the user wants
to turn it into an error then they just use -Werror.
- [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors, Mark, 2008/03/26
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors, Weddington, Eric, 2008/03/26
- [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument, Ron Kreymborg, 2008/03/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument, hutchinsonandy, 2008/03/31
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument, Ron Kreymborg, 2008/03/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument, Andy H, 2008/03/31
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument, Ron Kreymborg, 2008/03/31
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument,
Weddington, Eric <=
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors, Weddington, Eric, 2008/03/26
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/03/27
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc build errors, Neil Davey, 2008/03/27