Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument

[Andy H]

It's possible to have a target specific compilation flag that turns 
error into warning. Perhaps

-no-error-but-warn-me-until-i-figure-it-out.

..or similar.





Ron Kreymborg wrote:
> > Can the "error" have  overide?
> >
> > Might that be useful to permit code generation for a new variant
> > before GCC has caught up with full definitions?
> >
> > Andy
> >     
>
> The ones for the ISR macros were originally warnings, but their occurrence
> invariably meant the jump table was not linked to the interrupt function.
> Ditto with the proposed ISRN macros. But yes, I see your point, and warnings
> would allow the compile to proceed. Perhaps the doco could explain what are
> the consequences when the warning appears and then it is "user beware".
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>