[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega
From: |
Patrick Blanchard |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:14:53 -0500 |
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 08:44 -0700, Galen Seitz wrote:
> Eric Pasquier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > What new MCU can I use ?
> >
> > - Atmel have AT91SAM7 series: about 50Mips (only 3 times)
> > - others ?
>
> The AT91SAM7 parts are 32 bits, so I believe you would see more than three
> times improvement. That said, I think a DSP part might be a better choice,
> given what you are implementing. I'd look at the TI TMS320F2801.
>
perhaps you might consider cross compiling to more than one platform
with gcc? using a 32 bit platform also opens the option of using a linux
kernel. to begin, you might consider the SH4 platform, which is the Sega
Dreamcast console:ebay has tons for sale - a great 32 bit cross compile
learning platform.
If you want to take this further; 8 bit AVR w/ 32 bit platforms on the
same board, using open source platforms let me know by email.
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, (continued)
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Loveny Design, 2005/10/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, David Kelly, 2005/10/12
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Gavin Jackson, 2005/10/12
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Eric Pasquier, 2005/10/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Galen Seitz, 2005/10/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Eric Pasquier, 2005/10/13
- [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Eric Pasquier, 2005/10/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Galen Seitz, 2005/10/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega,
Patrick Blanchard <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Trampas, 2005/10/13
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Patrick Blanchard, 2005/10/13
Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Dmitry K., 2005/10/13
RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Loveny Design, 2005/10/13