Re: AW: [avr-gcc-list] Double desirability

[E. Weddington]

Haase Bjoern (PT-BEU/EMT) * wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have doubts, whether one could succeed in realizing similar efficiency with 
> plain C functions. However, one might stand chances to succeed when using 
> inline assembly.
> In my opinion, one might even consider to integrate the floating point support into gcc itself. 
Sure, but you know how hard it is to get patches into the FSF tree of GCC.


> This would also resolve the bug, that fp support is broken when forgetting to 
> link with -lm.
>
>  

Our other solution, which perhaps would be easier to implement, is to 
combine libm with libc. There's no compelling reason to have them 
seperate anyway.

-------

But this thread really ought to be continued on avr-libc-dev.

Eric