[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping
From: |
MK |
Subject: |
Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:12:41 -0500 |
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:42:07 GMT
address@hidden (Karl Berry) wrote:
> it addresses an issue that
> some people may not know about, so maybe it would be good to
> briefly explain further?
>
> I agree, thanks. I changed the text to look like this:
>
> By default, the Make rules should compile and link with @samp{-g},
> so that executable programs have debugging symbols. Otherwise, you
> are essentially helpless in the face of a crash, and it is often far
> from easy to reproduce with a fresh build.
Sigh. Make sure you *do not* really put my name in the Changelog, then,
because this is not at all what I was suggesting -- everyone who uses
make knows *what debugging symbols are for*.
What they may not know, and what I did not know, was that *they do not
degrade performance* under normal conditions. So congrats on a
pointless re-wording, hopefully someone can go through this again
later ;)
--
"The angel of history[...]is turned toward the past." (Walter Benjamin)
- Re: default -g ??!?, (continued)
- Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 2010/11/20
- Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 2010/11/21
- reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), MK, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Karl Berry, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Karl Berry, 2010/11/22
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping,
MK <=
- Re: default -g ??!?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/11/21
- Re: default -g ??!?, Warren Young, 2010/11/22
- Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 2010/11/20
Re: default -g ??!?, Russell Shaw, 2010/11/20