[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:42:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:29:39AM -0700, David Everly wrote:
> I should have used this (because test.txt is not constructed):
>
> dist_sysconf_DATA = $(top_srcdir)/test.txt
>
> However, I've regularly run 'make distcheck' and it gives no error
> with the original sysconf_DATA. How can this be?
`make distcheck' creates a tarball, unpacks it to a new directory and
runs build and install there. This implies that test.txt was
installed during the process. So it seems it was available.
When you run `make dist' with the old setup, is test.txt packed in
the resulting tarball?
Perhaps the file was mentioned in EXTRA_DIST, or another list of
distributed files. In that case it would not be strictly necessary
to use `dist_sysconf_DATA' instead of `sysconf_DATA'.
But in most cases, it is more readable to use `dist_sysconf_DATA'.
HTH,
Stepan
- sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/08
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/08
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/10