[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: back to directory dependencies
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: back to directory dependencies |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:31:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:59:36PM CEST:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > > d1, d2, l1, l2, src1, src2 are existing projects with Makefile or
> > > configure.ac / Makefile.am. I want to leave them as they are and write a
> > > Makefile that would build them in the necessary order according to the
> > > dependencies.
> > >
> > > So, how can I specify the build dependencies?
> >
> > Put
> > AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([d1 d2 l1 l2 src1 src2])
> > in toplevel configure.ac and
> > SUBDIRS = d1 d2 l1 l2 src1 src2
> > in toplevel Makefile.am, in the order in which you want them configured
> > resp. built.
>
> I've tried to implement that. I've put the following line in my topmost
> configure.ac:
>
> AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS(lib/l1 src1)
>
> configure runs configure in lib/l1 and src1. However, src1/configure
> tries to link against lib/l1/libl1.a and fails since it can't find it.
Hmm. I don't know whether AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS can give you the
flexibility you want here. If you unconditionally build both packages,
there is no need to check for libl1 during src1/configure.
I agree that this limits flexibility, but don't know of anything better
off my head (maybe someone else can suggest a better way).
> So I need to have lib/l1 built before I can configure src1.
> The only solution that I can think of is to use configure-stamp,
> make-stamp and introduce custom dependencies between them.
Or just take the existence of the library for granted: you know that it
will be built.
Regards,
Ralf
- Re: back to directory dependencies, (continued)
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/10
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/29